--- Begin Forwarded Message ---
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:05:01 -0600
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: scale (WAS latitude and longitude)
Sender: [log in to unmask]
The way that I explain large scale vs. small scale to people, in terms of
the ratio used at least, I ask "would you rather have 1/4th of a pie or
1/400th of a pie? This shows how the 1:4 scale is larger than the 1:400
scale, or how the 1:40,000 scale is larger than the 1:400,000 scale." I
usually get an "aha" reaction with that example. --Sue Ann
.
}
{ Sue Ann Gardner, MLS
. } N209 Love Library, Cataloging/Maps
{ University of Nebraska-Lincoln
} Lincoln, NE 68588-0410
{ . 402-472-3545, 402-472-2534 (fax)
} [log in to unmask]
{
} . .
Johnnie
Sutherland To: [log in to unmask]
<jsutherl@ARCHE cc:
S.UGA.EDU> Subject: Re: langitude and lontitude <fwd>
Sent by: Maps
and Air Photo
Systems Forum
<MAPS-L@LISTSER
V.UGA.EDU>
02/20/2001
02:53 PM
Please respond
to krockwel
--- Begin Forwarded Message ---
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:10:00 -0700
From: Ken Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: langitude and lontitude
Sender: Ken Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
Nat Case wrote:
> My big problem in this case is with the names latitude and longitude,
> neither of which is especially expressive of the meaning (and any
> obvious mnemonics get misleading... which way is "long"?). I know its
> not quite the same, but the nautical terms "northing" and "westing"
> make a lot more sense to me.
>
> I went to the dictionary just now to check and latitude comes from
> Latin for "breadth," and longitude comes from "length." Not helpful
> to me, as neither really involves direction.
One could think of it this way: as Latitude has to do with breadth,
remember which lines are of varying length: the east-west running
ones, which shorten as you approach the poles. But longitudes are
always LONG, i.e. the same length (minus variation in the shape of
our oblate spheroid.
Regarding scale:
> Another geographical designation that always confuses me is
> small-scale and large-scale: small-scale maps show larger areas in a
> smaller frame. They have a smaller scale if you think of scale as a
> rational number (1/X), but in the rational scale the "other number"
> (1:X) is larger.
Way back in the cartography class I took in undergraduate
college, the instructor told us all a simple pnemonic for
remembering: "Large scale: man's large." Or, to sound less
sexist, I tell my patrons, "Large scale, the features are large."
Things show up larger on a large-scale map, including people if
they were portrayed.
--Ken Rockwell
University of Utah
--- End Forwarded Message ---
--- End Forwarded Message ---
|