Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 7 Sep 2006 07:44:05 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: MAPS-L: map drawer capacity
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 05:55:55 -0500
From: Gail Harris <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Gail Harris <[log in to unmask]>
To: Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
You're not nuts. The numbers will work, however what I've discovered is that with the half-size and more specifically with the one-third to quarter-size maps is to have inserts placed within the drawer to prevent their side-to-side slippage. I currently have hand-made wooden inserts that separate my one third-size maps, which keeps them neatly in place.
Gail
Gail Ann Harris, M.L.I.S.
Archivist/Special Librarian
SpecPro Environmental Services
Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant
8451 St. Route 5
Ravenna, OH 44266-9297
Office: 330.358.1753
Cell: 216.225.8533
-----Original message-----
From: "A. Cope" [log in to unmask]
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:25:37 -0500
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: MAPS-L: map drawer capacity
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: map drawer capacity
> Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 17:18:06 -0400
> From: Michael Fry <[log in to unmask]>
> Organization: University of Maryland Libraries
> To: Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a large collection of maps coming my way (~32,000), and I need to figure out if I have space
> to shelve them properly. I've seen the literature that suggests limiting drawers to 200-250 maps,
> but it's not clear to me if drawer capacity can actually vary with the size (and thus weight) of the
> maps.
>
> For example, if 200 sheets is the max suggested drawer capacity for full-sized maps, doesn't it
> follow that 400 half-sized sheets (or 800 quarter-sized sheets) would also be acceptable? After all,
> the overall weight would be roughly similar in each scenario, and the height of each stack (and
> hence the ease of shelving and reshelving) would also be the roughly the same.
>
> Or am I nuts?
>
> Thanks for any help you can provide.
>
> mf
>
> --
> Michael Fry
> Maps Librarian
> Government Documents & Maps
> University of Maryland
> 301.314.1357 | [log in to unmask]
>
|
|
|