-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Sanborn copyright
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:22:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Julie Sweetkind-Singer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Julie Sweetkind-Singer <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Hi, all,
We did a copyright lookup for all of our Sanborns as we have none that
are pre-1923. We found that about 60% had been renewed. We will scan
the remaining 40%. The task was not too onerous and was able to be done
by a bright undergraduate who went to the Law School stacks where the
copyright books were held. It was worth it to do the work as we did not
have that many sets.
Best,
Julie
***
Julie Sweetkind-Singer
Assistant Director of Geospatial, Cartographic and Scientific Data &
Services
Head Librarian, Branner Earth Sciences Library & Map Collections
Stanford University
397 Panama Mall; MC 2211
Stanford, CA 94305
(650)725-1102
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Angie Cope" <[log in to unmask]>
*To: *[log in to unmask]
*Sent: *Wednesday, February 6, 2013 8:11:25 AM
*Subject: *Re: Sanborn copyright
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Colleen Cahill" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "Air Photo 'Maps, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship'"
<[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2013 5:52:53 AM
Subject: RE: Sanborn copyright
Rich,
Copyright for Sanborn maps is complex. As you state, anything 1922
or older is in the public domain, but even some sheets the Library of
Congress has that were originally published before 1923 have Copyright
issues because Sanborn did copyright the paste downs. That being said,
we also found that Sanborn did not always renew the Copyright on all
cities; it seems to have concentrated on large cities and many smaller
communities are now public domain. Unfortunately, you will need to have
a Copyright search on each publication to verify this; we do not have
the man power for this and are using the 1922 date as our break point.
We only putting up later work when we receive confirmation of other
dates being out of Copyright, mostly getting this from patron searches.
If you have the 1922 and early Sanborn sheets and there are no paste
downs on them, you should be able to put them up. If the sheets were
revised and republished, they would have a new date on them; be sure to
check the index sheet for updates. The Philadelpha set at LC is mixed.
Our inventory
(http://www.loc.gov/rr/geogmap/sanborn/city.php?CITY=Philadelphia&stateID=45)
shows that volumes 1 to 14 are pre-1923 and a quick check reveals there
were no updates, so we could put those online. The latter volumes are
likely in Copyright, so we would not scan those.
Hope this was helpful!
Colleen
Colleen R. Cahill
Digital Conversion Coordinator and
� � � � Recommending Officer for Fantasy and Science Fiction
Geography & Map Division
Library of Congress
101 Independence Ave. SE
Washington, DC 20540-4650
W: 202-707-8540
Fax: 202-707-8531
[log in to unmask]
These opinions are mine, Mine, MINE!
-----Original Message-----
From: Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Angie Cope, American
Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 3:56 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Sanborn copyright
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Sanborn copyright
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:46:49 -0500
From: Rich Boardman <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
CC: Rich Boardman <[log in to unmask]>
Hi,
I'm a bit confused about copyright as it pertains to the Sanborn
volumes. It's clear that everything published 1922 and before is in the
public domaine but does that apply to maps that have been revised
annually? Do renewal filings count? The first 14 volumes of the
Philadelphia Sanborns were originally published 1922 and before but they
were revised on an annual basis.
I have volumes from the mid-1950s and mid-1960s whose copyright was
renewed in the 27th-28th year time frame. Does this extend the original
copyright even if they were originally published pre-1922? Does the pre-
1923 copyright only apply to volumes that were never revised?
I know this is murky territory but does anyone have experience in
this situation? Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
Rich Boardman
Map Collection
Free Library of Philadelphia
[log in to unmask]
|
