Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship |
Date: | Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:06:15 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Metadata standards for GPS coordinates?
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:40:22 -0800
From: Virginia R. Hetrick, Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
To: Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Hi, Ken,
Your formats are kind of confusing. What does an A-umlaut represent,
please? I see the degree symbol and the minutes symbol.
IMHO, one thing I've found works for me (NOT a universally accepted
standard) is the way I have the data formatted in my signature block
below. One thing that drives me crazy is having stuff like
34.14038889N, probably because I still believe in the existance of
minutes and seconds. But, I realize a lot of people who are using GPS
have no clue about minutes and seconds and rely on their GPS to get them
to wherever with no interest or inclination to see it on a "proper" map
or think about the matter in terms of a "proper" map. ;~(
v
--
\ / Virginia R. Hetrick, here in sunny California
0 Email: [log in to unmask]
Oo "There is always hope."
My fave: http://www.washington.edu/cambots/camera1_l.gif
There's no place like: 34N 8' 25.40", 117W 58'5.36"
if you can't be at: 48N 6' 59.9" 122W 59' 54.2"
|
|
|