DSSAT Archives

DSSAT - Crop Models and Applications

DSSAT@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Matthias Langensiepen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Matthias Langensiepen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:13:12 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (104 lines)
Dear all

the recent concern of Dr. Andarzian about our
calibration of CERES-Wheat requires a response:

It was not easy to critize a model which has
taken a lot of efforts to construct and
which is still in widespread use as demonstrated
on this list server. I deeply admire the authors
of DSSAT who contributed significantly to modern
crop modelling and provided a wealth of inspirations
for advancing crop research.

Our motivation to carry out this study and the
discussion of its results are described in the
paper which is the reason for not quoting
them again. However, I would like to respond
to the genetic coefficient issue:

Bahram Andarzian is right in a way that the genome
of a plant is fixed. 30 years after the CERES
model was formulated we are able to decipher the
genome of a plant and can potentially get fascinating
insights into its metabolism. Practically, however, this
is like getting a book which we have waited for for a long
time, but are unable to read. Millions combinations
of metabolic pathways are possible and we are still
very far away even from crasping the complexity of plants.

Using only a handful of so-called "genetic parameters"
is a very crude approximation of this complexity which
is necessary to allow for a practical application of
the model. We do not critize this pragmatic approach.

What we do critize, however, is that the majority of
DSSAT-users do not allow for their changes over time.
A farmer who has cultivated a field for 30 years
knows very well that no crop season is like the other
and that plants respond to these fluctuations in flexible
manners. The underlying biological mechanism is differential
gene activity which results in numerous adaptation strategies
which can differ greatly between seasons. The extreme
seasonal differences of weather conditions at
Schleswig-Holstein (ranging between approx. 250
and 1000 mm rainfall per year with no regular
distribution, for example) forced us to calibrate
the model for each season separately. I hope
this clarifies the issue (We strictly
followed the user guidelines by the way.)

Plants are more clever than we often think.
Francis Halle, a well known botanist from France,
quoted the French writer Michel Luneau in this context,
"who knows how to make the tree speak: For us, say the
trees, all is connected so that there is no need for
any particular centralization. Our internal organization
recognizes neither God nor a master. It is a free association
of elements of different and complementary organs.
These obey nobody but themselves and ask of
their followers a simple and essential agreement:
growth. Each organ is free in the means by which it
attains growth. To each according to its
inspiration..." (Halle F. 2002. In Praise of Plants.
Timber Press. Page 99).

Do we need separate crop coefficients for each plant organ
and season ?

Have a nice weekend.

Matthias






Dear my friends DSSAT servers
   Hi
   Please if possible, see the article entitle" validating CERES-wheat
under North-German environmental condition" by M. Langensiepen and
co-authors in Agricultural Systems Journal (article in press). This
article challenges the using and performance of CERES-wheat model to
simulate grain yield and biomass production under different water and
nitrogen conditions.
   In my idea genetic coefficients are cultivar-dependent and should not
be changed over years, but in their calibration procedure, they assume
genetic coefficients are environment-dependent which according to
environmental condition of each year have changed! If so, what is the
mean of the yield variability? In my idea, yield variability is the
yield of a crop over different years or in the other word, running the
model with fixed genetic coefficients over different years.
   Apparently, it seems that they did not calibrate water and nitrogen
modules in their work!
   This case may be a good discussion topic for DSSAT servers and
sharing information about strength and weakness points of the DSSAT
models with each others.

   Best
   Bahram Andarzian
   Ph.D in Crop Eco-physiology
   Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Khuzestan
   Ahvaz-Iran

ATOM RSS1 RSS2