MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:52:04 -0600
Reply-To:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8
From:
Angie Cope <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (105 lines)
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Paige Andrew" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "Air Photo Maps, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:28:50 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: Searching Government Publications in Google Books | ALA Task Force on Google Books Settlement

Since PSU is a Google Books project partner through the CIC I get
updates on the project once in a while in different venues here at
work. If I recall correctly, they are not scanning atlases during
this phase/version of the project but it is something, along with
maps and other graphic images, that they'd like to do later...

Paige

At 07:53 PM 1/12/2010, you wrote:
>Forwarded from Govdocs ... does anyone know if Google Books is
>scanning atlases? I remember hearing that they weren't including
>folded maps in books ...
>
>Angie
>
>----- Forwarded Message -----
>From: "Amy West" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 1:30:23 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
>Subject: Searching Government Publications in Google Books | ALA
>Task Force on Google Books Settlement
>
>Hi all,
>
>I want to call your attention to an issue about which I hope GODORT or other
>ALA members on this list will have an opinion: users' ability to locate
>digitized government publications via http://books.google.com.  Bill Sleeman
>has been representing GODORT on the ALA Task Force on the Google Books
>Settlement.  He has tried repeatedly to get some momentum around the issue
>of access to government publications digitized by Google from Google Books
>at http://books.google.com.  You can see his latest effort at
>
>Google and Government Documents. Should ALA work with Google to make federal
>documents scanned from FDLP collections available in full-text for all
>users? Read about it on ALA Connect at http://connect.ala.org/node/91525
>
>Background:
>The situation is a little complicated, but I believe I am correctly
>summarizing it when I say that:
>
>    - Google is digitizing materials that are otherwise considered public
>    domain, like what libraries receive via the FDLP.
>    - Google's basic rule is pre-1923 materials are public domain and will be
>    fully available.
>    - Google's other basic rule is that post-1923 materials are not public
>    domain and will not be fully available.
>    - However, government publications should be an exception to this rule.
>    - Google has included in both versions of its settlement a Safe Harbor
>    provision which should provide legal cover for full display of works that
>    may contain copyrighted material prior to a full determination
> of the status
>    of any included copyrighted material.
>    - Google's position re post-1923 government publications is that they may
>    contain copyrighted material - in hearings for example.
>    - Google does not appear to be using the Safe Harbor provisions to make
>    post-1923 government publications available.
>    - In fact, Google appears to be taking the most cautious approach
>    possible.
>
>
>While I understand that Google is being sued by pretty much everyone ever,
>like Bill, I have concerns not only about Google's approach to post-1923
>government publications, but ALA reactions to the same.  Yes, eventually,
>there will be points of access to digitized materials from library
>partnerships.  And yes, libraries can subscribe to fee-based services for
>digital copies of government publications.  But I feel both of these
>reactions miss the point.  If the material can be made fully available, why
>isn't it?  If Google has built itself a loophole for materials that might be
>questionable, why aren't we seeing it in action?  If the materials are
>already digitized, why should anyone have to wait for Library Partners to
>update their catalogs?  For that matter, why should we expect users to go to
>any individual catalog or other database when it's _Google_ - the default
>search tool for most Internet users - that has the digitized materials
>already?
>
>Possible Action:
>If you care to follow ALA's activities on this topic or share your views,
>consider logging into ALA Connect at http://connect.ala.org and joining the
>group at this address: http://connect.ala.org/node/90049
>
>Best,
>Amy West / GODORT Chair
>--
>A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy
>enough people to make it worth the effort.   - Herm Albright
>
>Amy West
>Data Services Librarian
>10 Wilson Library
>University of Minnesota
>309 - 19th Avenue South
>Minneapolis, MN 55455-0414
>Phone: (612) 625-6368
>Email: [log in to unmask]
>Google Mail, IM, Docs, Reader: ae.west
>Web: http://www.lib.umn.edu/data
>del.icio.us: umdatalib
>Twitter: http://twitter.com/amyewest

ATOM RSS1 RSS2