DSSAT Archives

DSSAT - Crop Models and Applications

DSSAT@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anne Elings - Maize Physiology/Modelling/Breeding <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DSSAT - Crop Models and Applications <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Apr 1996 09:20:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
The problems with converting Zadoks growth stages to DSSAT growth
stages emerge only before anthesis, as far as I can see. After
anthesis, both the Zadoks and DSSAT stages describe the various
filling stages of the kernel. Before anthesis, however, the Zadoks
stages track number of leaves and tillers visible in the field,
whereas the DSSAT stages define basically the daylengt sensitive
period.
One way to relate both scales would be (see the work of e.g.
Miglietta for this):
- final leaf number depends on the daylength at emergence and the
latitude of the location where the material was domesticated or bred;
- the rate of leaf emergence is a function of the ambient
temperature;
- the number of spikelets per spike is related to the time between
double ridge and terminal spikelet
 
This model makes some gross assumptions, but should be helpful in
converting things.
 
Good luck,
 
Anne Elings

ATOM RSS1 RSS2