Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:07:46 -0600 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
================================================
MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L
================================================
Subject: Re: MAPS-L: Scale in a microform map
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005
From: Paige Andrew <[log in to unmask]>
To: Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
References: <[log in to unmask]>
Chris,
In the APPLICATION part of rule 3B in 'Cartographic Materials,' the very last
thing says, in following methods towards determining a scale, "If no scale
can be determined by any of the above means, give 'Scale not given'."
I'd follow this....
Paige
At 12:52 PM 12/13/2005, you wrote:
>================================================
>MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L
>================================================
>
>
>Subject: Scale in a microform map
>Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005
>From: Christopher Winters <[log in to unmask]>
>To: Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
>References: <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>I would be very grateful for advice about the correct way to
>describe the scale of a microform map, especially if there is no
>easy way to determine the scale of the original paper product.
>"Scale not given"? The apparently forbidden "Scale indeterminable"?
>
>Any suggestions would be appreciated--thanks.
>
>Chris Winters
>Bibliographer for Maps [etc.]
>University of Chicago Library
>
>
>
>--
--
|
|
|