Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:08:53 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
American Geographical Society Library |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Map Classification Colon Technique
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 19:59:10 +0000
From: Bob Thomas <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Should the geographic cutter colon technique be used at the county
level? For example, for natural features (lakes, streams, mountains)
within a county and/or named areas of a county (e.g., named areas used
by the county planning staff). Is there a stated policy on this?
Thanks for any guidance you can provide.
/Bob Thomas/
Integrated Systems Librarian & Head of Cataloging
Western Washington University Libraries
Bellingham, WA
|
|
|