Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:17:27 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
American Geographical Society Library |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: table G4362
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:30:11 -0700
From: Jon Jablonski <[log in to unmask]>
To: Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship <[log in to unmask]>
Is it true that there is not a 'Northern California' or a 'Southern
California' region Cutter in table G4362? How can this be?
Or am I missing something obvious?
I realize local subdivisions typically get done locally, but I don't
think it's just map libraries in California that have a lot of northern
and southern California maps.
--
Jon Jablonski
Map & Imagery Laboratory
Davidson Library
UC Surf Board
|
|
|