Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:44:36 -0400 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
--- Begin Forwarded Message ---
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:54:05 -0700
From: Philip Hoehn <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: required number of subject headings <fwd>
Sender: Philip Hoehn <[log in to unmask]>
You do need a subject heading containing the geographic area name, when
applicable. The theory is that place is the most important element for
cartographic materials. A "map" showing various kinds of landforms in a
nonexistent place would only need a topical heading. Headings beginning
with a topical subject which is subdivided geographically do count.
Phil Hoehn, Librarian
David Rumsey Collection, San Francisco
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:52:13 -0400 Johnnie Sutherland
<[log in to unmask]> writes:
> --- Begin Forwarded Message ---
> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 08:25:31 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Sharon Saunders <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: required number of subject headings
> Sender: Sharon Saunders <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
> Hello Map Catalogers,
>
> I'm new to map cataloging and have been reading the wonderful map
> cataloging manuals and books, but I still have a rather basic
> question
> about the number of subject headings. Chapter 4 of LC's Map
> cataloging
> manual says: "Every map of an identifiable place must have a
> subject
> heading for the area." If you have a subject heading that is
> subdivided
> geographically, such as Geology--[Place]--Maps does that count as
> the
> subject heading for the area, or, to fulfill the requirement quoted
> above,
> do you need an additional 651 heading that begins with the place
> name?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Sharon Saunders
> Principal Cataloger
> Bates College
> [log in to unmask]
> --- End Forwarded Message ---
>
--- End Forwarded Message ---
|
|
|