Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 24 Sep 2002 19:11:15 +1200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Couldn't agree with you more. I think Andrew has seen the error of
>his ways (inconsiderate approach) and will not repeat his tyrades on
>the list. His posting on the mollusca list today was the last straw
>for me. In contrast, I have found the exchanges with Ken indicate
>that he is open minded and ready for a good argument so long as it
>is rational or attempts to be so.
Tirades? ONE posting, with short comments only. And I got some really
good feedback from Mollusca listees.
The fact is that crackpot ideas are nonsense (though, like a
schizophrenic's pseudological constructs, they may seem sensible to
those with insufficient knowledge to be able to make a valid
judgement), and will come to nothing. And tThe fossil record does not
in any way support him. He is no Tesla.
And that's my say.
--
Andrew Grebneff
165 Evans St, Dunedin 9001, New Zealand
<[log in to unmask]>
Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut
|
|
|