Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 13 Aug 1999 19:10:28 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kurt Auffenberg wrote:
> >Kurt, as always, is right.
>
> I'm going to get this enlarged and framed....put it on the mirror so I can
> read it every morning while shaving.....better yet, give it to my wife.
>
> This brings to mind something for you to ponder over the weekend......
>
> If a man is alone in the forest and says something.......is he still wrong?
> Sorry, but this may lose something in translation for our foreign
> correspondents....
>
> I know the answer. I bet most of you do too. Have a good weekend.
Hello!
Hi to the Polymita commenters,
Ha Ha!! Now could you please give me a straight answer. I will repeat the
questions, if you dont mind.
>I have a few more questions on the Polymita descriptions.
>Polymita brocheri ("Gutierrez" Pfeiffer 1864) : this is as cited by C.
>de la Torre in his monograph.
>1) What do the " " enclosing Gutierrez mean, that he, Gutierrez,
>described it in Pfeiffer's work,
>or that Pfeiffer referenced a description by Gutierrez (from a letter I
>think)?
>2) Arango amended the name to brocheroi in 1878: this is as cited by
>Tucker Abbott, I assume C. de la Torre did not know this. Is this correct?
>The correct name is now brocheroi and should be cited as brocheroi?
>(Note: The species was named for General Brochero)
>Your kind attention and help is much appreciated.
Later,
Emilio Jorge Power
Please visit;
"The Liguus Home Page"
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Gold/9440/liguus/lighompa.html
West Melbourne, Florida USA
|
|
|