CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Monsecour <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Mar 1998 10:34:26 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (27 lines)
Dear Mike,
 
the problem with this shell is that it is not a real Cypraea, but not a
real Ovulid either. The authors thought it would be best to create a new
family for it; but I don't know why it's in Cypraeidae.
 
David
Belgium
 
On Tue, 24 Mar 1998, Michael Hoelling wrote:
 
> Nachricht geschrieben von INTERNET:[log in to unmask]
> >Can anyone give me an update of the case of that Chimaeria incomparabili=
> s
> stolen from the American Museum of Natural History in NY, one year ago?
> <
>
> Talking about this species, I didn=B4t see the original paper, but upon
> seeing pictures of the shell I wonder why it should be classed in the
> family Cypraeidae (as in Guido Poppe=B4s Website) and not with the Ovulid=
> ae.
> Does anybody know more about it?
>
> ciao
> Mike
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2