CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andrew Grebneff <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 10 Aug 2002 17:29:15 +1200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
The HSN scale does not reflect reality. Since when does 'good" mean
poor? Personally, I don't use it. And some dealers seem to have their
own interpretations... normally very optimistic ones.

When I say a shell (say, for exchange) is good I mean GOOD condition,
though not gem.

>Jim Cordy brought up the topic of shell grading, so i just thought i'd
>review it again - what the heck??
>Good: Not good.   Nasty stuff happening.
>
>Fair: Not fair at all!!!  Recognizeable as the species or form but
>beyond that.....
>
>Poor: Recognizeable as a shell.

If you're lucky.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2