I don't see why the name "demani" should not be emnded if ICZN art. 31.1.2
and art 32.5.1 are applicable.

Gijs C. Kronenberg

----- Original Message -----
From: "M. J. Faber" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: De Jong & Coomans


> The contents are the same. By the way, following the "new" ICZN
regulations
> the name "demani" should not be emended.
>
>
> Marien
> www.mollus.nl
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paolo G. Albano" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:11 AM
> Subject: De Jong & Coomans
>
>
> > >At 06.49 05/01/2004 -0500, you wrote:
> > >>This shell is an Engina Gray, 1839 [type Purpura turbinella Kiener,
> 1836].  It is close to some Brazilian forms I've referred to E. demanorum
de
> Jong and Coomans, 1988 [emendation of E. demani; sp.451 de Jong, K. M. and
> H. E. Coomans, 1988.  Marine gastropods from Curaçao, Aruba and Bonaire.
E.
> J. Brill, Leiden, v + pp 1-261 incl. 47 pls.].
> >
> > I have recently bought a copy of
> >
> > de Jong, K. M. and H. E. Coomans, 1988.  Marine gastropods from Curaçao,
> Aruba and Bonaire.
> >
> > as Volume LXIX of the Series "Studies on the Fauna of Curaçao and other
> Caribbean Islands" edited by Wagenaar Hummelinck & van der Steen,
Foundation
> for Scientific Research in Surinam and the Netherlands Antilles,
Amsterdam,
> 1998.
> >
> > I wonder if it is the same book published also by E.J. Brill.
> > Number of pages and plates are almost the same.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Paolo