CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Ross Mayhew" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 00:05:00 -0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
    I am wondering about a very pale Cypraea lamarki i have from
Zanzibar.  It has virtually none of the pitting or scratches typical of
subfossil specimens, yet it is "washed out" in color in a fashion
similar to the way subfossils become.  The question is: is it possible
to have a subfossil with no pitting or scratches?  Personally i can't
see it, because they have to be dead first, then they are surrounded by
sand for thousands of years - so one would think they would pick up at
least a few "dings" in that process.
    Here is the critter in question:
http://www.schnr-specimen-shells.com/26454.JPG - it has a couple of
small pit-like marks, but i have looked at it under 10x and it has no
scratches.  One of my more knowledgeable customers says it is a
sub-fossil, but i am decidedly unconvinced.  Opinions?

 From still chilly New Scotland,
Ross Mayhew.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2