CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Monfils <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:39:20 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
If we can't always agree on designations under a system with only a half
dozen possible grades (including "+" designations), I don't think that
increasing the number of possible grades would improve matters. Under the
present system, some folks would rate a given shell fine+ while others would
rate the same shell fine or fine ++.  Only one degree of difference. Under a
10-grade system, some would rate a given shell 7 while others would rate the
same shell anywhere from 5 through 9.  One or two degrees of difference,
though the same amount of variation, expressed as percentage.  The system is
very subjective, and some individuals are more conservative graders than
others. This will always be true, regardless of the grading system used.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2