CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andrew Grebneff <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:28:35 +1300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Hi Gijs

It just occurred to me, when I was looking through a folder on my Mac
and found your work on Lambis x Sinustrombus, that hybrid genera are
open for description as new genera.

It is normal with orchid workers to describe hybrid genera
(Sophronitis, Laeliocattleya, Potinaria etc). I'd bet that there's
nothing at all about this in the Code.

Why not do it? Lambistrombus? Strombilambis? Digitistrombus? Grebneffia?? (ha!)

--
Regards
Andrew Grebneff
Dunedin
New Zealand
Fossil preparator
Mollusc, Toyota & VW van fan

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2