Even though I don't have one, I'd like you to know how much I enjoy all
the different web sites.  Everyone looks at things with different
perspectives.  Different foci(?) are what make it fun for me.  Don't
make creators feel as though they have to compete with one another.
Half of them would probably discontinue their sites.
                      Jen. (in Phoenix)
 
 
 
>From [log in to unmask] Fri Dec 25 13:37:37 1998
>Received: from [128.192.1.102] by hotmail.com (1.0) with SMTP id
MHotMail309207465648173506532496216006691815180; Fri Dec 25 13:37:37
1998
>Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by listmail.cc.uga.edu (LSMTP for Windows
NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 25 Dec
1998 16:37:33 -0500
>Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by
UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2c/1.8c) with BSMTP id 3382; Fri, 25 Dec 1998
16:36:34 -0500
>Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP
release 1.8c)
>          with spool id 1274 for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 25 Dec
1998
>          16:36:33 -0500
>Received: from UGA (NJE origin SMTPIN@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail
V1.2c/1.8c)
>          with BSMTP id 1523; Fri, 25 Dec 1998 16:36:33 -0500
>Received: from Rt66.com [198.59.162.1] by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP
V2R4a)
>          via TCP with SMTP ; Fri, 25 Dec 1998 16:36:32 EST
>Received: from Rt66.com (pmd07.rt66.com [198.59.176.40]) by Rt66.com
>          (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA07273 for
<[log in to unmask]>;
>          Fri, 25 Dec 1998 14:37:29 -0700 (MST)
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (Win95; I)
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>References: <[log in to unmask]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Message-ID:  <[log in to unmask]>
>Date:         Fri, 25 Dec 1998 14:39:57 -0700
>Reply-To:     Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
>Sender:       Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
>From:         Tom Eichhorst <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject:      Re: how about a survey??
>To:           [log in to unmask]
>
>ferreter wrote:
>
>> since we have such a diverse group with at least one primary interest
why
>> don't we do a survey and see who's malacology web-site is the best ?
sort of
>> an unofficial pole of sorts. ?
>>
>
>No way would I touch that!  Even a list of the top ten would leave out
too many
>really nice sites.  I regularly flip through these sites to catch any
updates
>and new images.  Not making the list just might cause someone to
abandon their
>hard work.  Now after saying all of that, I do believe I will put a
list of my
>favorite sites in our club's next newsletter.  Just thinking about it
now, I
>came up with ten without even breaking a sweat -- all with images.  If
I try
>I'll bet I come up with twice that number.  Maybe the top site is
Conch-L where
>many of these other sites are brought to the attention of 300 some
shellers.
>
>Mark, hope your holiday was and is great.  I just finished setting up
my new
>telescoping lens with a light -- useful for old, failing eyesight and
for some
>of those impossibly some shells.
>
>See ya,
>
>Tom Eichhorst in New Mexico, USA
 
 
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com