CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jorge Mendez Fuentes <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Jan 1999 13:37:48 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Kaz wrote:
>
> Hi there to You All,
> As we are "new" collectors (of Cones & Cowries), could  we ask for
> some sensible advice?
> The best part of shell collecting is to dive out a Gem that you dont
> already have, on a remote reef in some exotic location. However as
> thats not always possible, we have decided to "purchase" some shells
> from locations and parts of the world that we are unlikely to visit.
> This is my question: if one was to spend $100, does it make more sense
> to buy ten common $10 shells, or one rare $100 shell ?  We generally
> collect for the asthetical beauty, but obviously rarity is also a
> prime consideration.
> Your coments would be greatly appreciated,
> Regards Lynne &  Zak        e-mail  [log in to unmask]
> SOUTH AFRICA
 
 
Dear Friends.
 
I think we are two different kinds of shell collectors:
 
I4m a amateur collector too. I4ll take some of the $ 10 shells. I will
buy a $100 shell only if is a beautiful specimen that I desire very much
(murex and latiaxis).  My collection is aesthetical too. The rarity is
secundary to me. I don4t have "one specimen of every species".  You must
classifie your shells, and learn about molluscs, but these is a placer
too.
 
For the professional collectors, the scientific specialist, the rarity
is important. They study these beens. They need have the  biggest number
of species as possible.
 
For both of us, the "hobby partner" and the "scientific", we enjoy the
shells.
 
Regards
 
Jorge Mindez
Mexico

ATOM RSS1 RSS2