CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kurt Auffenberg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Apr 1999 16:58:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
At 03:20 PM 4/5/99 -0500, you wrote:
>How's this for an ambiguous answer....yes, to some degree, but not always.
>Some minute land snails (and marine, I'm sure) have proportionately (the
>operative word) large radulae and some large snails have proportionately
>small radulae, take the cones for instance.  It depends more on just what
>the critters are doing with it.
>
>
>Interesting. Does a snail's radula grow throughout a snail's life?
YES.  OLD, WORN TEETH AT FRONT END DISCARDED.  NEW ONES GENERATED IN REAR.
 
>Within a genus, are the radulae of large species larger than the radulae
of small species?
I'M NOT SURE, BUT AGAIN, IT DEPENDS MORE ON WHAT THE SPECIES IS DOING WITH
IT.  HOWEVER, SAY, ALL HELICOSTYLIDS FEED ON MICROFUNGI OF BASICALLY THE
SAME SIZE AND CONSISTANCY, WHICH GROW ON TREE BARK OF THE SAME DEGREE OF
SMOOTHNESS (NONE OF WHICH IS TRUE).....I WOULD ASSUME THAT THE LARGER
SPECIES WOULD HAVE LARGER RADULAE.  WOULD AN EXCEPTION TO THIS 'RULE' BE
FOUND?  ABSOLUTELY!
 
KURT

ATOM RSS1 RSS2