CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mathilde Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 29 Oct 1999 16:42:37 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
> In following the oiling shells conversation,  I'm reminded that I have used
> glycerin on  my Paryphanta lignaria lusca to keep the periostracum from
> drying up and popping off of the shell . I have heard stories of the shell frac-
> turing into many small  pieces in an explosive manner. Glycerin was always
> recommended for protection.
>
> However, it renders the shell useless for scanning electron microscope work,
> so I've been told. How does it interfere ?  Is this true with all shells ? Would
> mineral oil work just as well for the paryphanta ?
>
> Glycerin is hygroscopic, absorbing moisture from the air. It dissolves into alcohol
> or water, but will not dissove into oil. It also has a very high boiling point. Glycerin
> is used in clear soaps, in lotions as an emollient, in lubricants for molds and for
> scientific specimen preservation. Who else uses it on shells ?
>
> Is glycerin better or worse  than oil for coating shells if they are not going to be
> used for research under the  microscope?
>
> Thank you.  Don't forget to turn your clocks  back on Saturday.
>
> Mathilde Duffy
> [log in to unmask]
> Watertown, MA  ( Boston suburb )

ATOM RSS1 RSS2