CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Wolff <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Aug 2001 07:52:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Babelomurex is listed as valid both by Vaught and in "Southern Synthesis"

I'm having some troubles about this question, and I would like to know wich
>is the most extended opinion: Is there enough evidences at this momment as
>to consider Babelomurex a separated genus inside the Coralliophilidae or
>not?
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>Alfonso Pina
>Malaga
>Spain
>http://www.eumed.net/mala


  John Wolff
2640 Breezewood Dr.
Lancaster, PA 17601

ATOM RSS1 RSS2