Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:36:16 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
A fun shell-related topic! I forget who first referred to an operc as a
"dead toenails" but it makes me laugh every time.
Considering cones, maybe it's from their baby toe?
Cheers,
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Conchologists of America List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Andrew Grebneff
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 8:10 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Perks
> I have a Conus literatus. It is about nine inches tall. So is its
>opening. It has a perk. The perk is about one inch. The question
>is: what the hecky darn good does such a small perk do?
Decoration, of course!
Seriously, I expect the operc is retained despite its apparent
obsolescence due to inertia. I wonder how large the opercs of Eocene
Conus were? Perhaps then they sealed the aperture?
Well, why do some Sinum still have a small operc?
--
Andrew Grebneff
Dunedin, New Zealand
64 (3) 473-8863
<[log in to unmask]>
Fossil preparator
Seashell, Macintosh & VW/Toyota van nut ________________________________
I want your sinistral gastropods! ________________________________
Opinions in this e-mail are my own, not those of my institution
_______________________________________________
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
|
|
|