CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andrew Grebneff <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:31:59 +1300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:57 AM, He Jing <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Thanks for all reply.
>
> But I am confused. Which is caudatum?
>
> Best Regards
> He Jing

I agree that the specimen is Linatella caudata (but am unsure whether
the ending should be a or um).

Linatella, on shell characters alone, is not distinct from Monoplex.
Monoplex is distinct from Cymatium ss, which has only a very few and
very distinctive species (lotorium, femorale, ranzanii, triangulatum
(=perryi) and one other which I can't think of just now.

The rest of "Cymatium" belong to various genera, most of which are
more-or-less clearcut (ha!), such as Gelagna, Ranularia etc.

--
Andrew Grebneff
Dunedin, New Zealand
Fossil preparator
Mollusc, Toyota & VW van nut

<[log in to unmask]>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2