The WoRMS database cites
Terryn Y. (2007). Terebridae: A Collectors Guide. Conchbooks & NaturalArt.

as an authority for recognizing both Impages and Hastula and for
putting both of those in Impages as valid species.

However,
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012 Jul;64(1):21-44. doi:
10.1016/j.ympev.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

Macroevolution of venom apparatus innovations in auger snails
(Gastropoda; Conoidea; Terebridae).

Castelin M, Puillandre N, Kantor YI, Modica MV, Terryn Y, Cruaud C,
Bouchet P, Holford M.

includes in its abstract the statement: "The non-monophyly of most
terebrid genera analyzed indicates that the current genus-level
classification of the group is plagued with homoplasy and requires
further taxonomic investigations."

It doesn't seem to have analyzed salleana.

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Marlo Krisberg <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Not to stir up a hornet’s nest, but what’re current opinions?  Is H.
> salleana a separate species from H. cinerea, a subspecies, or simply a
> geographic morph (a form)?  If they interbreed (as Harry suggests), can they
> be separate species?
>
>
>
> If they are separate species, what is the range for H. cinerea?
>
>
>
> Has Impages replaced Hastula?
>
>
>
> Any good recent references on these issues?
>
>
>
> Marlo



--
Dr. David Campbell
Visiting Professor
Department of Natural Sciences
Gardner-Webb University
Boiling Springs NC 28017

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------