CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Martin Eastburn <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:27:11 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
While living on Kwajalein, we collected Harpa amouretta
in 1963 and qualified it in 3 of our books.
Martin Eastburn

On 1/14/2015 8:34 AM, Chong Chen wrote:
> Thanks Marlo. I have seen a great variety in the form of H. amouretta
> including the slender form as well as various intermediates.
>
> A quick google search will reveal a number of slender specimens, for example
> http://www.gastropods.com/2/Shell_122.shtml
> http://koghisberg.com/?p=3944
> http://www.schnr-specimen-shells.com/35649.JPG
> http://www.conchology.be/?t=68&u=886353&g=1b0cd83e15aaddada2c0195478bc058b&q=c87e7c3942ff38191e699c6a2fcdff89
> http://www.marinelifephotography.com/marine/mollusks/gastropods/olives/harpa-amouretta.htm
> http://www.shellbrothers.be/images/Harpidae/amouretta%20Indonesia%201,5%20(2).JPG
>
> The specimens range all the way from eastern Africa to Hawaii -- it is
> only a form of H. amouretta.
>
> Regarding H. kolaceki, I would agree that it is only a form of H.
> amouretta as well.
>
> Best,
> Chong
>
> 2015-01-14 14:22 GMT+00:00  <[log in to unmask]>:
>> I have to go with H. amouretta for Rick's shells.  I've documented this conversation on LTS (http://z14.invisionfree.com/Conchologist_Forum/index.php?showtopic=2894) with Rick's photos (and permission) and added photos of a H. amouretta from the Solomons in my collection.  While there are are some overall shape differences, with my shell more closely resembling forma crassa, I cannot see how Rick's shells can be distinguished as other than a normal, local, regional variation for the species.
>>
>> marlo
>>
>> ---- Tom Eichhorst <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> I agree with Rick.  While the shells he illustrated may not be H.
>>> gracilis, they are certainly unlike any of the H. amouretta I have
>>> (another 30 specimens to that 50).
>>>
>>> Tom E.
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
>> To leave this list, click on the following web link:
>> http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
>> Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
>> click leave the list.
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> [log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
> To leave this list, click on the following web link:
> http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
> Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
> click leave the list.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2