Thanks for explaining all that.

> On Apr 11, 2021, at 2:54 PM, Harry Lee <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Forgot to mention the fact that this MollscaBase contribution occurred a month after his first volume was published (August, September, 2010).
> 
> Harry
> 
> 
> On 4/11/2021 2:50 PM, Harry Lee wrote:
>> My customary reaction to an inquiry on the max size of a somewhat obscure bivalve species is to look at Huber (2010, 2015) since he provided the greatest dimension of all species he illustrated, and often his datum exceeds that in less authoritative works.
>> 
>> This time, however, I was shocked to find that it seems he did not treat the species at all despite the fact that he edited the treatment on the taxon in MollscaBase <http://molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=420729>. This may be the first time he's disappointed me!
>> 
>> Harry
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/11/2021 1:51 PM, John Wolff wrote:
>>> I have it as 37.2 - but as usual, I can't give you the source since It's in my database just for personal use.
>>> 
>>> John
>>> 
>>> On 4/11/21 1:08 PM, Susan J. Hewitt wrote:
>>>> Can anyone give me the current WRS for Glycymeris spectralis? Thanks.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> [log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
> To leave this list, click on the following web link:
> http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
> Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
> click leave the list.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------