Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:24:04 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Allen SD Map Artifact
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:28:45 -0600
From: Mike Flannigan <[log in to unmask]>
To: Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
[log in to unmask]
<[log in to unmask]>
It was on the DRG. I'm not sure about the original map.
So maybe it was as simple as the bottom edge getting
caught up in the scanner. I thought it was some kind
of electronic processing error.
Mike Flannigan
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Dennis McClendon wrote:
>Subject: Re: Allen SD Map Artifact
>Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:06:39 -0500
>From: Dennis McClendon <[log in to unmask]>
>To: Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>> The 1981 "Allen" South Dakota 1:50,000 scale topo has
>> an interesting artifact, or stretch-compress error on it
>
>Is this on the actual paper map, or only apparent in the DRG?
>
>DRGs are made by scanning paper maps, and this sort of error could
>easily result if the map didn't feed through the scanner properly.
>
>If you've seen it on the printed map, one prepared by traditional
>negative-plate printing, that's harder to understand.
|
|
|