CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Geoff Macaulay <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 20:38:11 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Dear Helmut
I think this may just be a mistake as Ariophantidae is a separate family in
other publications from around this date and later (1989 onwards). I have
always regarded Ariophantidae as separate to Helixaroionidae.

Geoff


>From: Helmut Nisters <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Compendium of landshells by Tucker Abbott
>Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:35:00 +0200
>
>Dear Conchlers,
>
>could anybody using this compendium explain me
>something, as I don't understand it.
>In the picture part of this work there is under
>family Helicarionidae on page 127 named
>Helicarioninae (- inae for subfamily) and
>Ariophantinae (again - inae for subfamily), but in
>the systamtics just Ariophantinae is an own family
>itself. Ariophantidae. How could it happen. Is
>the part of systematics done later or better.
>with best shelling greetings waiting for answer
>under [log in to unmask]
>Helmut Nisters
>
>=====
>Helmut Nisters
>Franz-Fischer-Str. 46
>A-6020 Innsbruck / Austria
>phone: 0043 512 573214
>e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>web: www.netwing.at/nisters
>
>__________________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

ATOM RSS1 RSS2