Dear George et al,

My confusion comes from a paper by Kilburn(1988), where I believe he raised
'Tylotiella' to genus level, and then placed it in the subfamily Drilliinae.
  This is not a problem in itself, however, to me 'powelli Kay, 1979', no
longer seems to fit.

Ghost Sheller


>From: "George P. Holm" <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Question regarding taxonomic placement within TURRIDAE &
>        MITRIDAE
>Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 10:14:36 -0800
>
>I have found no change for Clavus (Tylotiella) powelli Kay, 1979 in the
>volumes of turrid litterature I have looked at over the past two years.
>George
>
>
>
>Dear Conch-lers,
> >
> >
> >
> >I have a handful of questions today.
> >
> >
> >
> >First, within the family Turridae, where is 'powelli Kay, 1979' currently
> >placed?  I know that originally Kay recorded it as 'Clavus (Tylotiella)
> >powelli'.  However, with all the changes during the 80 and 90's in this
> >family, I'm not sure where to place it.
> >
> >
> >
> >Second, within the family Mitridae, where does the genus Neocancilla
> >currently fit?  I have seen it placed within two different subfamilies:
> >Imbricariinae and Mitrinae.
> >
> >
> >
> >Lastly, within the family Triphoridae, can someone tell me the
>author/date
> >for the subfamily Mastoniinae and the genus Litharium?
> >
> >
> >
> >As always, thank you in advance.
> >
> >
> >
> >Sincerely,
> >
> >
> >
> >Ghost Sheller
> ><mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> ><http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_itl_EN.asp'>http://explorer.msn.com
> >


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp