CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Charles Sturm <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Jun 1998 22:53:24 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (19 lines)
Kim,
  It appears that Tom Waller had also compared many specimens in coming to
his conclusion that they were the same.  It would be interesting to
perform a multi-variate analysis to see if there is a true conchylogical
difference between these forms.  Would you have data such as height to
width ratios, rib numbers, height to width of the resilial insertion, etc,
etc.?  If you did I know someone who might be able to perform such an
analysis.  Let me know if you have such data, I unfortunately have had the
opportunity of only studying a handful of these "two" taxa.
 
Charlie
******************************************************************************
Charlie Sturm, Jr
Research Associate - Section of Invertebrate Zoology
                     Carnegie Museum of Natural History
Assistant Professor - Family Medicine
 
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2