CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andrew Grebneff <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:30:52 +1200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>Dear Andrew et al.,
>
>Why not use the terms "valid biospecies," and "available name" to
>avoid the ambiguities of "taxon" (a natural kindred of organisms vs.
>a name for same) and "valid" (available [as in name] vs. the proper
>name for a biospecies [as in not a junior synonym])?
>
>Harry

That would work well. IF you could get all of the "authorities" to
see the sense of doing so!
--
Andrew Grebneff
Dunedin, New Zealand
64 (3) 473-8863
<[log in to unmask]>
Fossil preparator
Seashell, Macintosh & VW/Toyota van nut
I want your sinistral gastropods!
-----------------------
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top posting frowned upon?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2