C. planorbis vitulinus, it should read.. I shouldn't post anything when
I'm exhausted.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Barclay" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: Announcing an Illustrated Checklist of the Living Conidae


> Congrat's on getting the cone pages up, Ross.  I notice Conus swainsoni
> Estival & von Cosel, 1986 is not listed.  I'm interested in this species
> since I found one yesterday.. in with my junk shells, since I thought it
> was just another C. planorbis vitellus, except that I noticed the purple
> inside the aperture wasn't as dark, and cleaned it up.  It was collected
> at 80 feet off Tutuila, American Samoa, which isn't New Caledonia, but
> not all that far away.  Is this species considered valid, or is it a form
> of
> C. circumactus?  And speaking of C. circumactus, can someone tell me
> what the differences are between regular C. circumactus and form C.
> c. hammatus?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Don
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> [log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
> To leave this list, click on the following web link:
> http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
> Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
> click leave the list.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------