Can someone point in the direction of Kohn's web site on Cones?
Thanks
Kevin Kutolowski
Locust NC
> [Original Message]
> From: Manuel J. Tenorio <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 9/22/2005 3:52:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Info on Conus clarki Rehder & Abbott 1951 sought.
>
> Well, I guess that this list is just some sort of informal forum in which
> we all can share comments, opinions and points of view. On the other hand
> you are completely correct when you state that opinions ex-catedra
> whithout any other support have no much value, and they must be published.
> My statement was based in my personal examination of the original
> descriptions and the available photos of type material. I haven't
> published nothing on this subject, but for instance Filmer (2001) shares
> this opinion, I guess that upon examination also of the available type
> material and descriptions. Others authors like Jerry Walls have similar
> points of view. Kohn's wen site is full of useful resources for conus
> researchers, including lots of original works in .pdf format that can be
> downloaded. Kiener picture and description of Conus crenulatus is there,
> for instance.
> Next time I will be more careful and will include a full set of
references!
> Warmest regards to all
>
> Manuel Jimenez Tenorio
>
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 20:34:38 GMT, Allen Aigen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> >Manuel,
> >I am not questioning the validity of your determination of synonomy, just
> the method of dissemination of the information. Has there been any
> publication of the change? Is this only your opinion or is this in common
> usage? Can you document the synonomy in American Conchologist or other
> publication? Like it or not, opinions need to be published before they
> really count.
> >
> >Allen Aigen
> >[log in to unmask]
> >
> >-- "Manuel J. Tenorio" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >Hi all
> >
> >C. clarki is just a form of Conus armiger Crosse 1858 (nomen novum for C.
> >crenulatus Kiener, 1845, non Deshayes 1835). C. frisbeyae Clench & Puley
> >1952 is another synonym. C. bajanensis (syn: C. guyanensis) is considered
> >by some a Southern subspecies of armiger). In any case, I do have an
> >article published in Johnsonia, 1953 by William Clench in which C.
> >austini, C. clarki and C. frisbeyae are described in detail. If
> >interested, please contact me privately.
> >Warmest regards
> >
> >Manuel Jimenez Tenorio
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
> >To leave this list, click on the following web link:
> >http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
> >Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
> >click leave the list.
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> [log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
> To leave this list, click on the following web link:
> http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
> Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
> click leave the list.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
