Dear Harry,
I fully agree that being an unnecessary replacement the Snyder name
is a junior objective synonym
of the Philippi name and invalid.
Yes with nomen vanum conxept I comprised unnecessary replacement names.
Moreover quandumpulchellus is an horrible latinisation
With regards
Riccardo
>Dear Riccardo,
>
>Maybe I'm missing something here:
>
>I agree with you that Fusinus quandumpulchellus Snyder, 2000 is an
>unnecessary replacement name for Fusus pulchellus Philippi, 1844,
>which you treat as an available taxon in the genus Fusinus.
>Therefore the Snyder name is a junior objective synonym of the
>Philippi name and invalid.
>
>The term nomen vanum is not authorized by the ICZN, and it seems to
>have at least two definitions. The prevailing one is an unjustified
>emendation.
>
>I don't think Snyder's action, however unjustified, is an emendation
>as defined in The Code.
>
>Harry
>
>
>At 02:32 PM 3/15/2010, you wrote:
>
>>Dear Oliver,
>>
>>Snyder create his Fusinus quandumpulchellum with the erroneous
>>opinion that Fusus pulchellus Philippi was in secondary homonymy
>>of Murex pulchellus Lamarck, 1822 when Monterosato 1872 transferred
>>Mediterranean Fusinus to genus Murex. This is not the case so
>>Fusinus quandumpulchellum is a nomen vanum
>>
>>Ciao
>>Riccardo Giannuzzi Savelli
>>
>>>Dear Olivier,
>>>F. quandumpulchellus (Snyder, 2000) is a morphotype of F. pulchellus.
>>>A very good work on this genus is:
>>>-Buzzurro G. & Russo P., 2007 - Fusinus del Mediterraneo. Revisione delle
>>>specie mediterranee recenti del genere Fusinus Rafinesque, 1815 (Gastropoda:
>>>Fasciolariidae). 280 pages and many colour tables.
>>>Cesare Bogi
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Olivier Caro" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 10:46 AM
>>>Subject: [CONCH-L] updates in mediterranean fasciolariidae
>>>
>>>>Dear List
>>>>
>>>>I need to refresh my knowledge in species of genus Fusinus from
>>>>Mediterranean area.
>>>>Status of the various taxa?
>>>>What becomes Fusinus quandumpulchellus?
>>>>May I understand Fusinus pulchellus is back?
>>>>Is there somewhere a table for determination of the small species, by
>>>>keys?
>>>>
>>>>Olivier Caro
>>>>
>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
>>>>To leave this list, click on the following web link:
>>>> http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
>>>>Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
>>>>click leave the list.
>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>
>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
>>>To leave this list, click on the following web link:
>>> http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
>>>Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
>>>click leave the list.
>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
>>To leave this list, click on the following web link:
>> http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
>>Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
>>click leave the list.
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
