CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrice Bail <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Oct 1998 21:38:47 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
MR ART WEIL wrote:
>
> Dear Andy;-
>        I agree that if you have hybrids, the hybrid-ing species
> (parents) should be nearby. In their absence, some other designation
> should be used-----up to and including "species".
>   Art
>
Absolutely true.Regarding Volutidae, when facing a weird specimen, hard
to classify, hybridism must be the last considered hypothesis and shall
be given up if several specimens with the same features are found in a
restricted area.Then isolated population with archaic character
(reversion?) is the most probable interpretation.Not only Hybridism
needs parents living nearby, but needs also that each parental
populations are on their "end of the cline".
I know only two cases of possible hybridism in Volutidae:
One in genus Amoria (ellioti+undulata), not the so-called "intermedia"
(presumed ellioti+macandrewi) which is a good species by itself, and the
other more dubious in genus Livonia (roadnightae+mammilla=quisqualis).
Scaphella worki Coltro can be an isolated population (thus a good
subspecies) of Scaphella robusta.
Pat.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2