CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ken Zentzis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:39:06 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Hi Joe and Andrew,
 
I've enjoyed the discussion of fossil cephalopods. Below you mention straight
"cones"...would this be the same as "straight cephalopods" (a term with which
I'm familiar)? In Minnesota I've seen specimens of Endoceras sp. (Ordovician,
Decorah Shale) 8 feet long, and also sections which would belong to examples
much longer (by virtue of their diameter). Specimens up to 14 ft. have been reported.
 
Ken Zentzis
Wichita, Kansas
 
NORA BRYAN wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Joe here (on Nora's E-mail).
 
>             As for 'giant' ammonites. There are a few specimens in the
> Jurassic here in Alberta that approach the 6 foot size in diameter. They
> have not been collected as they are in matrix at remote sites.  Now we
> will have to find one over 8 feet.  I do believe, however, that some
> straight 'Cones' were much larger; I will try and find a reference.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2