CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Art Weil <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 30 May 1999 05:59:03 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Dear Guido;-
        I think you have made the qualifying statement: "If it is different
enough!"
        Perhaps the standard should be: "If it is found to be unlike anything
else."
        I think the ones we object to are species that COULD be freaks of
something else, or should be listed as geographic "Forms", or (at the
outside limit) Sub-species. We keep getting species described as
diferent when, on a little reflection, they turn out to be C. dingdong
(with a hangnail).
        For me the problem continues to be a proliferation of descriptions for
the same species. Paschall counted over 20 descriptions and names for E.
lamellosum. AND THE NAMES NEVER DISAPPEAR! So eventually a dealer will
advertise: JUST DISCOVERED! The genuine C. hangnail!!
        Art

ATOM RSS1 RSS2