If a worker really knows the group she/he is working on then it does not
present a problem.  It's unfortunate that this has to occur, but it does
when a major monograph is being prepared and additional material is simply
not available.  If it really was a problem, peer reviews would zap it
pretty quickly.  Let's hope.

Kurt

At 09:00 PM 5/30/99 -0000, you wrote:
>    That's an easy question Art, TOO MANY!!!!
>If only one specimen was found to "represent" the "new species" wouldn't
>this be considered a freak mutation?
>Mark James & Peta Susan Bethke
>3001 South Ocean Dr. Suite 4-V
>Hollywood, Florida
>33019-2804
>U.S.A.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Art Weil <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Sunday, May 30, 1999 12:51 AM
>Subject: The Question Man
>
>
>>Just a little something to broil your minds with between burgers and hot
>>dogs.
>>        How many shells ARE known from the description of ONE example ONLY?
>>Sowerby's Ep. dubia might give you a start.
>>        Q-Man
>>
>