CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ross Mayhew <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Aug 1999 20:45:40 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Classically, genera were defined solely on the basis of conchological and sometimes radular
charactaristics as well.  However, with the advent of genetical analysis, it seems inevitable that
some genera and other "higher order" taxa will be spit up, modified, or even defined at least partly
on the basis of this type of analysis.
  My question is: has this started to occur already (example(s)?), and if it does, how is the
chonchologist without access to such advanced equipment to "corectly" assign new species to genera??
Curious in Canada,
Ross M.
--
Ross Mayhew:    Scns alize in the Unusual"
Phone: (902) 876-2241     Snail Mail; P.O Box 20005, RPO Spryfield,
Halifax, N.S., Canada, B3R 2K9.
But try to find "something for Everyone"!!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2