Thanks Leslie, very interesting. Good old Tucker — he had the right idea!

Susan


> On Nov 10, 2016, at 8:51 PM, Leslie Crnkovic <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Susan,
> 
> To provide a historical perspective...
> Going back to the 1988 1st edition of the AFS Common and Scientific Names of Mollusca... Turgeon et al
> 
> When working on a research paper some 12 to 14 years ago, I actually interviewed Turgeon on the matter.
> The reasoning at that time (consider the state of the PC and Typewriter of the late 80s), the POV of the AFS was that it was extra effort to make sure that each word was capitalized and to assure consistency they standardized all lower case.  Note, they were doing Fish and Crustacea also.
> 
> R. Tucker Abbott was deeply involved in the original debate, and ultimately lost the battle to capitalize these 'formal' names.  Abbott wrote several articles on the topic (don’t have access to the references at the moment), in one article I remember was him referencing an article he wrote called "Non-Capps Poops" but it that appears to have never been published.  Best guess is it was submitted to Astronaut Trail Shell Club.
> 
> Hope that helps,
> 
> Leslie Crnkovic
> San Jacinto College
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conchologists List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Susan J. Hewitt
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 12:51 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [CONCH-L] Common names and capital letters
> 
> I am currently helping put together a marine field guide for a small Dutch Caribbean island.  The guide will be in British English, and it will include fish and a whole range of invertebrate phyla as well as marine plants. The marine mollusks (spelled molluscs) are one chapter. For each species covered, the common name will be listed first, and then the scientific name.
> 
> I see that "Names of marine mollusks" by Turgeon et al, 1998, stated that common names in text should be used without capital letters, except where a proper noun is part of the common name.
> 
> However, that opinion seems to have changed. On the fisheries.org website,
> 
> http://fisheries.org/docs/pub_style10.pdf
> 
> The text states: 
> 
> "Most common names of fishes are now capitalized (see section 9.7 for further information)."
> 
> Section 9.7 clearly states:
> 
> "Following the usage in the 7th edition of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico (AFS Special Publication 34; 2013), new rules apply to the capitalization of species names.
> Capitalize the common names of all fish species, including those not in Common and Scientific Names and other AFS taxonomic publications."
> 
> The field guide we are preparing must use a unified system for the common names of all phyla, so I am planning to recommend that in the text we capitalize both parts of the common name (or where applicable all three parts) for all of the phyla including mollusks. So it would read like this "The Chestnut Turban is a common species in this area."
> 
> Any comments?
> 
> Personally I find that capitalization makes the common name stand out more clearly from the surrounding words, so I am quite happy to do this.
> 
> I will be grateful for any feedback.
> 
> Susan J. Hewitt
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> [log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
> To leave this list, click on the following web link:
> http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
> Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
> click leave the list.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------