Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 11 Jun 1998 07:02:15 PDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In former times some books on shells noted about 120 000 species
of gastropoda and about 25 000 species of bivalves. I didn't count
the species, but I think there are less as maybe is based only on
described shells with all the names and counting several synonyms too.
But we have a lot of synomomys too and many names of shells
should be get in synonomy also in future. So I believe that the number
of 100 000 is more realty than the higher ones.
What do you think ?
yours Helmut from Innsbruck in Austria
----------
>
> Dr Walker;-
> I rather like your quote of 100,000 species (give or take a few
> hundred). The number is nice and round. I also appreciate the
> proposition that many species are so far undescribed and undiscovered.
> But I doubt if the undiscovered species living in deep marine waters
> will amount to as many as live in shallow biomes. There's not as much
> to eat down there. And there probably is more open space for species
> to spread out. I'm sure that many undiscovered species live in the
> great rain forests;---but again, their numbers must be restricted
> only because we have spent a lot of time looking for them already.
> Art
>
|
|
|