CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Petit <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 16 Nov 2008 09:41:54 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Bob:

Turgeon et al. have the species dated correctly (as did you in your first
posting).  Whoever entered it at ITIS made the error.  Corresponding with
ITIS is not worthwhile.  My correspondence file with ITIS occupies two
standard envelope boxes.  Other than cephalopods, there are very few
mollusks in ITIS that are not in Turgeon et al. Other sources for molluscan
taxa have not been treated.

Sorry I can't supply the Swainson description for you.

dick

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2