Ross:
 
I for one agree with you.  If you enjoy your collection, it has
performed its function.
 
As to dead shells:  To consider a "GEM" dead shell as an inferior
product is completely ecologically nonproductive.  Particularly when
most people have no interest in periostracum and promptly and completely
remove what makes the live shells more scientifically valuable.  When
most people do not give two hoots about the operculum and turn up their
noses when a shell does not have one is rediculous.
 
When HMS was starting the shell grading system, I objected strongly to a
proposed statement that no one should be interested in "GOOD" or poorer
shells.  Many people can't afford to buy one of the high cost, rare
shells, but can spring for a poor specimen.  If it has some or many of
the characteristics of the GEM live shell, I believe it contributes to
their collection.
 
Aloha,
 
Wes