CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Olivier Caro <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Apr 2006 19:50:56 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
[Latin gender corrsp. genera/species]

Ave

Pagodula (fem) echinata (fem) OK
Hexaplex (masc?) trunculus (masc) ...OK
But...
Ocenebra (fem) erinaceus (masc)
Trophonopsis (fem) muricatus (masc):
This last one was first named Murex muricatus, with Murex supposed to be
masc.
Now that the species migrated to Trophonopsis, we are supposed, as
latinists, to change the gender...
But, as conchologists etc.,  are we allowed to do so, or is there a rule
somewhere that keeps the original gender, even if it became wrong ?

I always see some Ocenebra erinaceus here, there, there again, and
(sometimes) perhaps one little "erinacea".
I feel ill when I write "erinaceus" after an girl named Ocenebra, but I
continue, until someone tell me I'm allowed to write what I want.
What say the grammatical rules in Latin Zoology ?

Caro

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2