Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:33:22 +1300 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> I think this is not a favorable idea. How about our species concept? What was it like.... Think about that before naming a hybrid "species" or whole "genus"... or whatever taxon (!).
Hybrids have already been named (eg Lambis arachnoides {=wheelwrighti}
and also orchids at generic and specific levels), and are an excellent
example of instant evolution if they breed true with themselves and/or
either/both of their parent species, as appears to be the case with L.
arachnoides, as it is so common. However both parent species, if the
hybrids do not form a population, would preferably be known before
describing it as a new species.
Plenty of POSSIBLY hybrid specimens of various genus-level taxa occur,
but most of these cannot be confidently called hybrids and of course
should not be named.
They're there and they're not going to go away in a hurry.
--
Regards
Andrew Grebneff
Dunedin
New Zealand
Fossil preparator
Mollusc, Toyota & VW van fan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|