 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Sun, 24 Mar 2002 14:19:36 +0100 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Dear Stephen,
>
> In the book of Gert Lindner, which is excellent for
> its systematics the genus Drupa is under subfamily
> Rapaninae J. E. Gray, 1853(syn. Thaidinae
> Jousseaume,
> 1888)and belongs to family Muricidae and not to
> Thaididae, which is syn. of Muricidae. Neorapana is
> according then a subgenus of Thais.
> with best shelling greetings
> your old friend Helmut Nisters, not using more
> sieglinde hofer as firming, only in the e-mail
> address
>
>
>
> --- Stephen Ross <[log in to unmask]> schrieb:
>
> <HR>
> <html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>I started
> cataloging my shells today, so you'll probly being
> seeing a few questions from me... hee
> hee</DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV>This one is about some _Drupa_ shells I have
> from
> Hawaii. One source I really respect, Hoover,
> has
> them in the family Thaididae. However, other
> sources I've seen have them in the faimily
> Muricidae,
> subfamily Thaidinae. Actually, come to think
> of
> it, I have a _Neothais harpa_ who is in the same
> quandry. Sometimes they are also given the
> subfamily name Rapaninae. Are the Thaids their
> own family now, or still a subfam? If they are
> a
> subfam, which is better to use, Thaidinae or
> Rapaninae
> (aka, whats the difference between the two
> names)?</DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV>~Stephen~</DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Send and
> receive Hotmail on your mobile device: <a
> href='http://g.msn.com/1HM305401/14'>Click
> Here</a><br></html>
>
>
__________________________________________________________________
>
> Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
> Ihre E-Mail noch individueller? -
http://domains.yahoo.de
__________________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
Ihre E-Mail noch individueller? - http://domains.yahoo.de
|
|
|
