CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Franck Frydman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 1 Jun 2002 23:44:05 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Hello Ross ! Are we the only two interested in Harpidae ??? To me Harpa
goodwini Rehder , 1993 is nothing but a very large geographical variant of
Harpa kajiyamai Habe in Habe and Kosuge , 1970 . Nobody will ever know why
Rehder , who had also described the latter  in 1973 , did not compare his
1993 "new "species with Harpa kajiyamai .According to me Harpa kajiyamai and
Harpa goodwini are  identical since they only differ by the size . Franck
Frydman
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Mayhew" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 8:15 PM
Subject: Oops!! Harpa goodwini Rehder, 1993


> I'm REALLY good at making myself look stupid!  The beast in question is
> actually Harpa goodwini Rehder, 1993 - and i guess the question would be
> is this generally recognized as a full species, or has it since been
> relegated to being a subspecies or regional form of another Harpa,
> seeing how variable members of the genus are.
>
> -JR

ATOM RSS1 RSS2